About Required lighting and the MOT (APK): which statement is WRONG?

Explanation

Two red rear reflectors ARE required for passenger cars. Only the fire extinguisher is missing from the requirements list

Why learners get this wrong

• The passenger-car requirements name no fire extinguisher and no first-aid kit. Both are sensible, neither is an inspection requirement
• By day with seriously impaired visibility (such as fog) dipped headlights are required, not full beam. Full beam is moreover forbidden when meeting or following other traffic
• 'If visibility is less than 50 metres due to very dense fog or heavy snowfall (NOT in rain!) you may switch on your rear fog light.' In rain the rear fog light stays off, even below 50 m visibility

Topic: Required lighting and the MOT (APK)

Read the rule: Core: Required lighting and the MOT (APK)

Sections

• Challenge: Required lighting and the MOT (APK)
• The model: Required lighting and the MOT (APK)
• Core: Required lighting and the MOT (APK)
• Why it matters: Required lighting and the MOT (APK)
• Active recall: Required lighting and the MOT (APK)
• Teach back: Required lighting and the MOT (APK)
• Memory hook: Required lighting and the MOT (APK)

Terms

• Dipped headlights in poor visibility (RVV art. 32)
• Verlichting apk bestuurder ook aansprakelijk
• Verlichting brandblusser ehbo niet verplicht
• Verlichting grootlicht verbod tegenkomer volger
• Verlichting mistachterlicht 50m niet bij regen
• Mandatory lights front and rear

Related questions

• Two red rear reflectors ARE required for passenger
• At a check just outside Zwolle an officer
• It is ten o'clock in the morning on

Related topics

• Speed: two principles without their own number (see h04 for the maxima)
• Priority: the concept of a 'priority vehicle' (see h03 for the priority-to-the-right rule)
• Alcohol behind the wheel: the limit and the glass