Theory Mastery

Required lighting and the MOT (APK)

What the exam asks here: You already open the boot, expecting the officer to also ask for a fire extinguisher and a first-aid kit — like at a campsite in France.

14 minutes · 7 sections · 16 questions

The trap

Many learners think: A fire extinguisher and a first-aid kit are legally required in the car.

The rule is: The passenger-car requirements name no fire extinguisher and no first-aid kit. Both are sensible, neither is an inspection requirement

Challenge

You already open the boot, expecting the officer to also ask for a fire extinguisher and a first-aid kit — like at a campsite in France. The CBR exam designer counts on exactly that reflex. The book sets requirements for lights, not for emergency-supply items.

Read this section on its own page: Challenge: Required lighting and the MOT (APK)

The model

Front: two headlamps, two dipped beams, two side lights. Rear: two tail lights, two brake lights, number-plate light, two reflectors, one rear fog light, one reverse light. A fire extinguisher or first-aid kit appears on neither list.

Read this section on its own page: The model: Required lighting and the MOT (APK)

Core

By day with seriously impaired visibility (such as fog or heavy rain) and always at night, you use dipped beams. Full beam is forbidden by day, when meeting other traffic, and when following another vehicle closely — more light is not a better solution there. The rear fog light is regulated separately: you may only switch it on when visibility is below 50 metres due to very dense fog or heavy snowfall — explicitly not in rain (Book p.191, cross-chapter). A valid MOT certificate (APK) must have been issued for the registered vehicle. With an expired APK, both the owner/keeper and — once the vehicle is actually driven on the road — the driver are liable; two parties at once, not one.

Read this section on its own page: Core: Required lighting and the MOT (APK)

Why it matters

Wrong lighting costs visibility in two directions at once: too little light and others don't see you; full beam at the wrong moment and you blind others — or yourself, via reflection off fog. The 50 m threshold for the rear fog light exists precisely to prevent that dazzle: in rain a bright red rear light works against the cars behind you instead of for them.

Read this section on its own page: Why it matters: Required lighting and the MOT (APK)

Active recall

It is raining hard on the A28 near Zwolle, visibility roughly 40 metres. May you switch on the rear fog light?

Read this section on its own page: Active recall: Required lighting and the MOT (APK)

Teach back

Explain: when may the rear fog light be on, and why is rain never enough for that, even below 50 metres of visibility?

Read this section on its own page: Teach back: Required lighting and the MOT (APK)

Memory hook

Fog/snow <50m: rear fog light on. Rain: never. Fire extinguisher/first-aid kit: no legal requirement. Expired APK: owner/keeper AND driver liable.

Read this section on its own page: Memory hook: Required lighting and the MOT (APK)

Source: RVV 1990 art. 32 · WVW 1994 art. 72 · checked 2026-10-22

The picture

Required lighting: front vs. rearFrontRearMain lighting2 headlamps + 2 dipped beams + 2 side lights2 tail lights + 2 brake lightsAlso required2 indicators + hazard lightsnumber-plate light + 2 reflectors + reverse lightSpecial case (Book p.191)dipped beam required by day if visibility is seriously impairedrear fog light ON only below 50 m fog/snow, NOT rain
What to look at: Front: 2 headlamps, 2 dipped beams, 2 side lights, indicators. Rear: 2 tail lights, 2 brake lights, number-plate light, 2 reflectors, rear fog light, reverse light. Rear fog light only in fog/snow below 50 m, not in rain.

Signs and law

Test yourself

One November evening, just after sunset, you are pulled over just outside Zwolle for a general vehicle check. The officer walks around your car counting the lights out loud. Are you sure your car has enough of them?

Show the answer

Front: two headlamps, two dipped beams, two side lights. Rear: two tail lights, two brake lights, number-plate light, two reflectors, one rear fog light, one reverse light. A fire extinguisher or first-aid kit appears on neither list.

Exam questions on this topic

About Required lighting and the MOT (APK): which statement is correct?

  1. Besides the owner/keeper, the driver is ALSO liable, as soon as the motor vehicle is actually driven on the road.
  2. With an expired APK only the person driving the car is liable; the owner who lends the car out is not.
  3. A fire extinguisher and a first-aid kit are legally required in the car.
  4. In fog you switch to full beam, because that gives more visibility.
Show the answer

Correct answer: Besides the owner/keeper, the driver is ALSO liable, as soon as the motor vehicle is actually driven on the road.

Besides the owner/keeper, the driver is ALSO liable, as soon as the motor vehicle is actually driven on the road. Two liable parties at once, not one

Why learners get this wrong: With an expired APK only the person driving the car is liable; the owner who lends the car out is not.

Open this question

With an expired MOT (APK), only the owner or keeper is liable, not the driver.

  1. False
  2. True
Show the answer

Correct answer: False

Besides the owner/keeper, the driver is ALSO liable, as soon as the motor vehicle is actually driven on the road. Two liable parties at once, not one

Why learners get this wrong: With an expired MOT (APK), only the owner or keeper is liable, not the driver.

Open this question

About Required lighting and the MOT (APK): which statement is WRONG?

  1. Besides the owner/keeper, the driver is ALSO liable, as soon as the motor vehicle is actually driven on the road.
  2. 'If visibility is less than 50 metres due to very dense fog or heavy snowfall (NOT in rain!) you may switch on your rear fog light.' In rain the rear fog light stays off, even below 50 m visibility.
  3. A fire extinguisher and a first-aid kit are legally required in the car.
  4. By day with seriously impaired visibility (such as fog) dipped headlights are required, not full beam.
Show the answer

Correct answer: A fire extinguisher and a first-aid kit are legally required in the car.

The passenger-car requirements name no fire extinguisher and no first-aid kit. Both are sensible, neither is an inspection requirement

Why learners get this wrong: With an expired MOT (APK), only the owner or keeper is liable, not the driver.

Open this question

The passenger-car requirements name no fire extinguisher and no first-aid kit.

  1. False
  2. True
Show the answer

Correct answer: True

The passenger-car requirements name no fire extinguisher and no first-aid kit. Both are sensible, neither is an inspection requirement

Why learners get this wrong: A fire extinguisher and a first-aid kit are legally required in the car.

Open this question

About Required lighting and the MOT (APK): which statement is correct?

  1. A fire extinguisher and a first-aid kit are legally required in the car.
  2. With an expired MOT (APK), only the owner or keeper is liable, not the driver.
  3. In heavy rain you switch on the rear fog light, because visibility is poor then too.
  4. By day with seriously impaired visibility (such as fog) dipped headlights are required, not full beam.
Show the answer

Correct answer: By day with seriously impaired visibility (such as fog) dipped headlights are required, not full beam.

By day with seriously impaired visibility (such as fog) dipped headlights are required, not full beam. Full beam is moreover forbidden when meeting or following other traffic

Why learners get this wrong: A fire extinguisher and a first-aid kit are legally required in the car.

Open this question

About Required lighting and the MOT (APK): which statement is WRONG?

  1. The passenger-car requirements name no fire extinguisher and no first-aid kit.
  2. In fog you switch to full beam, because that gives more visibility.
  3. 'If visibility is less than 50 metres due to very dense fog or heavy snowfall (NOT in rain!) you may switch on your rear fog light.' In rain the rear fog light stays off, even below 50 m visibility.
  4. Besides the owner/keeper, the driver is ALSO liable, as soon as the motor vehicle is actually driven on the road.
Show the answer

Correct answer: In fog you switch to full beam, because that gives more visibility.

By day with seriously impaired visibility (such as fog) dipped headlights are required, not full beam. Full beam is moreover forbidden when meeting or following other traffic

Why learners get this wrong: A fire extinguisher and a first-aid kit are legally required in the car.

Open this question

It is raining hard on the A28 near Zwolle, visibility roughly 40 metres. May you switch on the rear fog light?

  1. Yes — visibility is below 50 metres, so the condition is met
  2. No — rain does not fall under the 50 m rule, not even at low visibility
Show the answer

Correct answer: No — rain does not fall under the 50 m rule, not even at low visibility

<50 m due to fog/snow: on. Rain: never

Why learners get this wrong: In heavy rain you switch on the rear fog light, because visibility is poor then too.

Open this question

About Required lighting and the MOT (APK): which statement is correct?

  1. With an expired MOT (APK), only the owner or keeper is liable, not the driver.
  2. Two brake lights ARE required for passenger cars, just like the reflectors.
  3. In fog you switch to full beam, because that gives more visibility.
  4. A fire extinguisher and a first-aid kit are legally required in the car.
Show the answer

Correct answer: Two brake lights ARE required for passenger cars, just like the reflectors.

Two brake lights ARE required for passenger cars, just like the reflectors. Only the fire extinguisher is missing from the requirements list

Why learners get this wrong: With an expired MOT (APK), only the owner or keeper is liable, not the driver.

Open this question

Two brake lights are not a legal requirement for a passenger car.

  1. False
  2. True
Show the answer

Correct answer: False

Two brake lights ARE required for passenger cars, just like the reflectors. Only the fire extinguisher is missing from the requirements list

Why learners get this wrong: Two brake lights are not a legal requirement for a passenger car.

Open this question

About Required lighting and the MOT (APK): which statement is WRONG?

  1. Two rear reflectors are not a legal requirement for a passenger car.
  2. The passenger-car requirements name no fire extinguisher and no first-aid kit.
  3. By day with seriously impaired visibility (such as fog) dipped headlights are required, not full beam.
  4. 'If visibility is less than 50 metres due to very dense fog or heavy snowfall (NOT in rain!) you may switch on your rear fog light.' In rain the rear fog light stays off, even below 50 m visibility.
Show the answer

Correct answer: Two rear reflectors are not a legal requirement for a passenger car.

Two red rear reflectors ARE required for passenger cars. Only the fire extinguisher is missing from the requirements list

Why learners get this wrong: A fire extinguisher and a first-aid kit are legally required in the car.

Open this question

All practice questions of this topic

Frequently asked questions

‘A fire extinguisher and a first-aid kit are legally required in the car’ – is that true?

No. The passenger-car requirements name no fire extinguisher and no first-aid kit. Both are sensible, neither is an inspection requirement

‘In fog you switch to full beam, because that gives more visibility’ – is that true?

No. By day with seriously impaired visibility (such as fog) dipped headlights are required, not full beam. Full beam is moreover forbidden when meeting or following other traffic

‘In heavy rain you switch on the rear fog light, because visibility is poor then too’ – is that true?

No. 'If visibility is less than 50 metres due to very dense fog or heavy snowfall (NOT in rain!) you may switch on your rear fog light.' In rain the rear fog light stays off, even below 50 m visibility

‘With an expired MOT (APK), only the owner or keeper is liable, not the driver’ – is that true?

No. Besides the owner/keeper, the driver is ALSO liable, as soon as the motor vehicle is actually driven on the road. Two liable parties at once, not one

‘Two brake lights are not a legal requirement for a passenger car’ – is that true?

No. Two brake lights ARE required for passenger cars, just like the reflectors. Only the fire extinguisher is missing from the requirements list

Related topics

Open in the app