On a road near Simpelveld you see a broken line on the side of the carriageway, with no advisory lane, and no sign at all. Based on the marking alone: may you assume that 80 km/h is certainly allowed here?
- ✓ No, the marking is an indication, not a guarantee — the real speed is on a sign
- Yes, the '80 km/h' marking is just as binding as a sign
Correct answer: No, the marking is an indication, not a guarantee — the real speed is on a sign
Explanation
The marking IS an indication, but NOT a guarantee; the real maximum speed is shown by signs
Why learners get this wrong
- The marking IS an indication, but NOT a guarantee; the real maximum speed is shown by signs
Topic: Signage: E/A/N-roads, K-signs and speed-indicating road markings
Read the rule: Core: Signage: E/A/N-roads, K-signs and speed-indicating road markings
Sections
- Challenge: Signage: E/A/N-roads, K-signs and speed-indicating road markings
- The model: Signage: E/A/N-roads, K-signs and speed-indicating road markings
- Core: Signage: E/A/N-roads, K-signs and speed-indicating road markings
- Why it matters: Signage: E/A/N-roads, K-signs and speed-indicating road markings
- Active recall: Signage: E/A/N-roads, K-signs and speed-indicating road markings
- Teach back: Signage: E/A/N-roads, K-signs and speed-indicating road markings
- Memory hook: Signage: E/A/N-roads, K-signs and speed-indicating road markings