What the exam asks here: Many practice bundles repeat a 'minimum speed' question with a specific figure and sometimes an accompanying law article, as if it came straight from this chapter.
Many learners think: This chapter (p.117-126) names a specific figure or law article for a legal minimum-speed duty.
The rule is: H04_wave0/SURVEY.md - none of the 5 actually opened pages (p.117-126) contains a citation about a minimum-speed law or a G3/A3 sign. What IS there (p.121-122) is a different, general topic: not driving unreasonably slowly
Many practice bundles repeat a 'minimum speed' question with a specific figure and sometimes an accompanying law article, as if it came straight from this chapter. On the five pages of this chapter that were actually opened (p.117-126), however, that figure appears nowhere. The trap is not the topic itself — it is acting as if every figure you have seen somewhere is also grounded in this book.
No citation found (p.117-126) for a legal minimum-speed duty or a G3/A3 sign. What p.121-122 DOES contain is a DIFFERENT topic: a general call not to drive unreasonably slowly because it obstructs the traffic flow (paraphrase, per the h04_wave0 SURVEY — not a literal book quote). Do not confuse that general flow-obstruction duty with a specific, legally fixed minimum speed.
This atom exists to cover a real CBR topic — minimum speed, often tied to the G3 sign ('mandatory minimum speed') or to the rule that certain slow vehicles may not use the motorway — but this chapter's survey could not find any citation on p.117-126 covering that specific content. For two reasons, nothing with a number or a specific law article is taught here: 1. Zero-invention rule: inventing a figure or article number because it 'probably matches' is exactly the kind of error this whole chapter is trying to fix (see the braking-distance error elsewhere in this chapter, F2). 2. Wrong page, not wrong topic: the topic itself does exist in Dutch traffic law — it likely just belongs to a different chapter (for example the traffic-signs chapter) that has not yet been opened for this atom. What IS established is the adjacent, general topic on p.121-122: do not drive unreasonably slowly, because it obstructs other traffic. That is a courtesy/safety duty, not a specific minimum-speed figure, and is mentioned here only for orientation — it is not tested.
This distinction protects you in two ways during the exam. First: if a question names a specific 'minimum speed' figure you have not seen anywhere in this chapter, that is a signal to be extra careful — not to accept it just because it 'sounds familiar'. Second: the confirmed rule — do not drive unreasonably slowly — is itself a real, frequently tested behavioural principle, and deserves your attention independent of any invented figure.
Which statement about this atom is correct?
Explain why this atom does not teach a specific minimum-speed figure, and which other, confirmed topic appears on p.121-122.
No book citation p.117-126 for a minimum-speed law — so no figure, no article. Confirmed instead (different topic, p.121-122): do not drive unreasonably slowly.
A3
G3
F2An online practice question claims: 'On the left lane of the motorway a minimum speed of 60 km/u applies.' Does that figure appear on this chapter's pages (p.117-126) of your book?
No citation found (p.117-126) for a legal minimum-speed duty or a G3/A3 sign. What p.121-122 DOES contain is a DIFFERENT topic: a general call not to drive unreasonably slowly because it obstructs the traffic flow (paraphrase, per the h04_wave0 SURVEY — not a literal book quote). Do not confuse that general flow-obstruction duty with a specific, legally fixed minimum speed.
Correct answer: False
Why learners get this wrong: This chapter (p.117-126) names a specific figure or law article for a legal minimum-speed duty.
Correct answer: You speed up to a suitable pace; driving unnecessarily slowly hinders the traffic flow
False — you assume a fixed figure for the lowest permitted speed. The book gives no such figure. What the book does say: do not drive unnecessarily slowly, because that hinders the flow and invites risky overtaking
Why learners get this wrong: This chapter (p.117-126) names a specific figure or law article for a legal minimum-speed duty.
No. H04_wave0/SURVEY.md - none of the 5 actually opened pages (p.117-126) contains a citation about a minimum-speed law or a G3/A3 sign. What IS there (p.121-122) is a different, general topic: not driving unreasonably slowly
No. Do not drive unnecessarily slowly: it obstructs the flow of traffic. You adapt your speed to the road and the conditions, not as low as possible