Core
The book names five situations in which you extend the ordinary 2-second rule to 3 seconds: rain, snow, fog, a heavily loaded vehicle, and a trailer or caravan (Book p.124). In each of these cases your grip is lower or your braking distance longer than normal — the extra second compensates for that. Three seconds is 1.5 times as much as two, not a doubling to four. Anyone who takes 'double your distance' literally keeps too much distance and can end up being cut off or overtaken awkwardly on a busy road. The cause of many rear-end collisions on motorways is exactly this: too tight a following distance, combined with distraction or fatigue (Book p.124). The 3-second rule in difficult conditions is the direct countermeasure.
Read this section on its own page: Core: 3-second rule: greater following distance in rain, snow, fog and heavy loads
Why it matters
On the A20 near Moordrecht, where fog often rolls in over the Groene Hart and traffic drives close together, 3 seconds is exactly enough to compensate for the longer braking distance on wet or slippery road surface — without leaving so much room that others squeeze in. Too little margin costs you reaction time; too much margin costs you the traffic flow.
Read this section on its own page: Why it matters: 3-second rule: greater following distance in rain, snow, fog and heavy loads
Source: RVV 1990 art. 19 · checked 2026-10-22
Frequently asked questions
‘In bad weather you double your following distance: from 2 to 4 seconds’ – is that true?
No. 'keep a greater following distance (3 seconds) in difficult conditions.' From 2 to 3 seconds is 1.5x as much, not a doubling to 4
‘The 3-second rule only applies with a heavily loaded vehicle or a trailer/caravan, not with rain, snow or fog’ – is that true?
No. The text names rain, snow and fog as separate, standalone reasons for 3 seconds, independent of load or trailer — each of the five situations is sufficient on its own
‘Rear-end collisions on motorways are mainly caused by technical vehicle defects, not by driver behaviour’ – is that true?
No. 'too tight a following distance (combined with distraction or fatigue) is THE cause of the large number of rear-end collisions on motorways.' The book points to driving behaviour, not technology